Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SFD · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #165 of 802 · scores higher than 80% of peers · safety percentile 80
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including SFD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SFD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.33× | 0.44× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | Not reported | 0.32 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 2.56× | 1.53× | 75% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 161 | 1.9B HKD (≈$241M) | 80 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 56 |
| 162 | 599.0B JPY (≈$4.1B) | 80 | 50 |
| 163 | 826.9B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 80 | 49 |
| 164 | 43.1B INR (≈$517M) | 80 | 42 |
| 165 | 7.2B USD | 80 | 72 |
| 166 | 235.8B INR (≈$2.8B) | 79 | 67 |
| 167 | 26.5B TWD (≈$821M) | 79 | 61 |
| 168 | 1.3B USD | 79 | 40 |
| 169 | 275M USD | 79 | 27 |