Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAGE · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #125 of 802 · scores higher than 85% of peers · safety percentile 85
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including NAGE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NAGE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.03× | 0.44× | 87% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 2.02 | 0.32 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 6.50× | 1.53× | 96% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 121 | 36.93T IDR (≈$2.3B) | 85 | 86 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 122 | 19.8B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 85 | 81 |
| 123 | 163.7B INR (≈$2.0B) | 85 | 63 |
| 124 | 425M NZD (≈$255M) | 85 | 76 |
| 125 | 187M USD | 85 | 78 |
| 126 | 65.89T IDR (≈$4.1B) | 84 | 80 |
| 127 | 11.5B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 84 | 44 |
| 128 | 6.6B TWD (≈$205M) | 84 | 41 |
| 129 | 91.9B INR (≈$1.1B) | 84 | 78 |