Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Vipshop Holdings Limited
How Vipshop Holdings Limited stacks up
VIPS · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,071 of 1,586 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score159 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including VIPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: -2.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 65% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.9% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -1.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VIPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VIPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | -2.3% | 3.7% | 26% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -1.4% | 4.1% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 0.9% | 4.3% | 35% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VIPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1,071 | 10.9B USD | 32 | 47 | |
| 1,071 | 4.9B USD | 32 | 51 | |
| 1,071 | 313M EUR (≈$344M) | 32 | 47 | |
| 1,071 | 121.2B INR (≈$1.5B) | 32 | 44 | |
| 1,071 | 6.2B USD | 32 | 69 | |
| 1,087 | 86.0B TWD (≈$2.7B) | 31 | 71 | |
| 1,087 | 15.4B JPY (≈$105M) | 31 | 34 | |
| 1,087 | 41.4B TWD (≈$1.3B) | 31 | 26 | |
| 1,087 | 36.7B JPY (≈$249M) | 31 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score