Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VIPS · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #154 of 1,604 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score169 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including VIPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | VIPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 35.7% | 7.3% | 93% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 7.7% | 6.4% | 57% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 9.2% | 3.3% | 88% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 23.5% | 7.7% | 88% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 23.4% | 30.2% | 39% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 154 | 92M USD | 90 | 78 | |
| 154 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 83.8B USD |
| 90 |
| 52 |
| 154 | 26.1B USD | 90 | 81 |
| 154 | 7.4B USD | 90 | 64 |
| 154 | 6.2B USD | 90 | 69 |
| 154 | 499M USD | 90 | 72 |
| 170 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 89 | 87 |
| 170 | 1.2B SAR (≈$337M) | 89 | 77 |
| 170 | 176.6B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 89 | 69 |