Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TotalEnergies SE
How TotalEnergies SE stacks up
TTE · against 14 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
25/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #14 of 15 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including TTE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 80% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -10.5% vs peer median -1.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: -6.2% vs peer median 0.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -9.5% vs peer median 1.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TTE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TTE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 15 reported | -6.2% | 8.7% | 7% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 15 reported | -9.5% | 16.0% | 21% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 15 reported | -10.5% | -2.9% | 14% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TTE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120.0B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 1 | 109.0B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 3 | 111.6B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 4 | 109.1B USD | 85 | 37 | |
| 5 | 110.5B USD | 73 | 61 | |
| 10 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 35 | 79 | |
| 11 | 297.1B USD | 33 | 53 | |
| 12 | 934.4B HKD (≈$119.6B) | 27 | 58 | |
| 13 | 108.0B USD | 26 | 55 | |
| 14 | 204.7B USD | 25 | 44 | |
| 15 | 122.6B USD | 15 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score