Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BP p.l.c.
How BP p.l.c. stacks up
BP · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #327 of 386 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including BP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 96% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -85.3% vs peer median 1.1%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -8.2% vs peer median -1.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: -1.1% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | -1.1% | 0.5% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -85.3% | 1.0% | 4% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | -8.2% | -1.3% | 27% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 323 | 4.1B CNY (≈$568M) | 16 | 32 | |
| 323 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 16 | 71 | |
| 323 | 9.6B USD | 16 | 62 | |
| 323 | 29.1B AUD (≈$19.2B) | 16 | 39 | |
| 327 | 122.6B USD | 15 | 32 | |
| 327 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 15 | 47 | |
| 327 | 455M EUR (≈$500M) | 15 | 31 | |
| 327 | 16.2B THB (≈$453M) | 15 | 45 | |
| 331 | 110.6B HKD (≈$14.2B) | 14 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score