Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Equinor ASA
How Equinor ASA stacks up
EQNR · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
26/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #284 of 386 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including EQNR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -11.0% vs peer median -1.3%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 74% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -32.6% vs peer median 1.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.6% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EQNR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EQNR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 2.6% | 0.5% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -32.6% | 1.0% | 26% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | -11.0% | -1.3% | 19% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EQNR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 281 | 2.8B CAD (≈$2.0B) | 27 | 56 | |
| 281 | 316M USD | 27 | 65 | |
| 284 | 291M GBP (≈$378M) | 26 | 73 | |
| 284 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 26 | 77 | |
| 284 | 108.0B USD | 26 | 55 | |
| 284 | 2.9B USD | 26 | 29 | |
| 288 | 5.7B CAD (≈$4.1B) | 25 | 51 | |
| 288 | 6.6B USD | 25 | 38 | |
| 288 | 1.2B USD | 25 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score