Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Marathon Petroleum Corporation
How Marathon Petroleum Corporation stacks up
MPC · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #23 of 386 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score41 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including MPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -0.7% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 78% of peers. Revenue growth: 15.0% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 333.7% vs peer median 1.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MPC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 15.0% | 0.5% | 78% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | 333.7% | 1.0% | 97% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | -0.7% | -1.3% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MPC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 19 | 22.3B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 95 | 72 | |
| 19 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 57 | |
| 19 | 7.5B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 23 | 900M USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 23 | 120.0B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 23 | 109.0B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 23 | 8.7B USD | 94 | 67 | |
| 27 | 2.9B CNY (≈$413M) | 93 | 49 | |
| 27 | 17.6B NOK (≈$1.7B) | 93 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score