Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SON · against 288 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #34 of 289 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score32 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including SON · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | SON | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 287 reported | 13.3% | 5.5% | 96% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 294 reported | 13.1% | 9.9% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 135 reported | 7.3% | 6.4% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 292 reported | 74.2% | 44.1% | 71% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 31 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.5B) | 87 | 61 | |
| 31 | 7.8B USD | 87 | 49 | |
| 31 | 2.5B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 87 | 60 | |
| 34 | 3.7B USD | 86 | 66 | |
| 34 | 4.8B USD | 86 | 67 | |
| 36 | 58.7B HKD (≈$7.5B) | 85 | 67 | |
| 36 | 3.6B USD | 85 | 54 | |
| 36 | 2.5B USD | 85 | 59 | |
| 39 | 21.8B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 84 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score