Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dana Incorporated
How Dana Incorporated stacks up
DAN · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
85/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #227 of 1,553 · scores higher than 85% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including DAN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 83% of peers. Earnings yield: 44.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DAN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | -1.5% | 4.4% | 17% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 17.8% | 8.8% | 86% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 4.6% | 6.1% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 75.7% | 57.2% | 62% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DAN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 227 | 3.6B USD | 85 | 54 | |
| 227 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score