Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SON · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #211 of 1,553 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including SON · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | SON | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 13.3% | 4.4% | 94% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 13.1% | 8.8% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 7.3% | 6.1% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 74.2% | 57.2% | 61% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 211 | 3.7B USD | 86 | 66 | |
| 211 | 299M GBP (≈$388M) | 86 | 55 | |
| 211 | 1.1B USD | 86 | 52 | |
| 211 | 1.8B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 86 | 76 | |
| 211 | 4.8B USD | 86 | 67 | |
| 211 | 770M USD | 86 | 48 | |
| 227 | 662.8B KRW (≈$477M) | 85 | 39 | |
| 227 | 1.1B HKD (≈$143M) | 85 | 53 | |
| 227 | 3.0B HKD (≈$389M) | 85 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score