Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Rush Enterprises, Inc.
How Rush Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
RUSHA · against 279 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #119 of 280 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score35 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including RUSHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 11.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RUSHA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RUSHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 281 reported | 5.0% | 5.5% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 283 reported | 9.7% | 9.9% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 6.7% | 6.4% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 283 reported | 45.2% | 43.4% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RUSHA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 119 | 22.9B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 60 | 43 | |
| 119 | 9.5B USD | 60 | 66 | |
| 119 | 9.4B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 119 | 5.1B USD | 60 | 59 | |
| 119 | 5.2B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 124 | 520.9B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 59 | 71 | |
| 124 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 59 | |
| 124 | 4.2B USD | 59 | 63 | |
| 124 | 2.5B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 59 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score