Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KTB · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #630 of 1,553 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including KTB · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | KTB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 5.3% | 4.4% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 11.1% | 8.8% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 9.9% | 6.1% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 14.7% | 57.2% | 12% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 630 | 520.9B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 59 | 71 | |
| 630 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 339M BRL (≈$61M) |
| 59 |
| 40 |
| 630 | 1.4B AUD (≈$954M) | 59 | 65 |
| 630 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 59 |
| 630 | 4.2B USD | 59 | 63 |
| 630 | 707M USD | 59 | 74 |
| 630 | 1.1B AUD (≈$741M) | 59 | 56 |
| 630 | 16.1B USD | 59 | 66 |
| 630 | 1.9B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 59 | 46 |