Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Rush Enterprises, Inc.
How Rush Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
RUSHA · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #108 of 356 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including RUSHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 11.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RUSHA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RUSHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.0% | 4.3% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 9.7% | 8.4% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 6.7% | 5.3% | 60% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 45.2% | 35.8% | 55% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RUSHA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 106 | 8.0B USD | 61 | 52 | |
| 108 | 9.5B USD | 60 | 66 | |
| 108 | 9.4B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 108 | 5.1B USD | 60 | 59 | |
| 108 | 5.2B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 112 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 59 | |
| 112 | 4.2B USD | 59 | 63 | |
| 112 | 707M USD | 59 | 74 | |
| 112 | 16.1B USD | 59 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score