Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
How Ranger Energy Services, Inc. stacks up
RNGR · against 58 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #18 of 59 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including RNGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.3% vs peer median 5.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.0% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 20.7% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RNGR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RNGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | 4.3% | 2.7% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 63 reported | 20.7% | 10.2% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 36 reported | 7.1% | 7.4% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | 92.1% | 88.6% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RNGR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 4 | 291M GBP (≈$378M) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 96 | 77 | |
| 14 | 363M USD | 82 | 37 | |
| 15 | 199M USD | 77 | 57 | |
| 16 | 306M USD | 76 | 48 | |
| 17 | 318M USD | 70 | 44 | |
| 18 | 328M USD | 69 | 54 | |
| 19 | 18.6B THB (≈$522M) | 68 | 61 | |
| 20 | 16.2B THB (≈$453M) | 67 | 45 | |
| 21 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 65 | 35 | |
| 22 | 261M USD | 63 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score