Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NACCO Industries, Inc.
How NACCO Industries, Inc. stacks up
NC · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #142 of 387 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including NC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 96% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.9% vs peer median 12.1%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.6% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 6.7% | 5.8% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | -1.4% | 12.4% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | -1.6% | 6.0% | 20% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 167.2% | 60.0% | 95% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 139 | 19.2B CAD (≈$14.0B) | 64 | 65 | |
| 139 | 1.0B SGD (≈$798M) | 64 | 53 | |
| 142 | 4.1B USD | 63 | 56 | |
| 142 | 56.7B USD | 63 | 57 | |
| 142 | 261M USD | 63 | 56 | |
| 142 | 7.5B USD | 63 | 79 | |
| 146 | 1.8B USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 146 | 113.8B BRL (≈$20.5B) | 62 | 65 | |
| 146 | 18.4B USD | 62 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score