Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NC · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #43 of 399 · scores higher than 89% of peers · safety percentile 89
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including NC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.29× | 0.49× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.56 | 0.48 | 41% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 3.30× | 1.37× | 90% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 39 | 1.3B USD | 90 | 53 | |
| 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 291M GBP (≈$378M) |
| 90 |
| 73 |
| 41 | 3.9B USD | 90 | 62 |
| 42 | 134M USD | 90 | 45 |
| 43 | 261M USD | 89 | 56 |
| 44 | 27.6B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 89 | 68 |
| 45 | 1.6B USD | 89 | 61 |
| 46 | 2.0B MYR (≈$443M) | 89 | 61 |
| 47 | 496M USD | 88 | 85 |