Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to North American Construction Group Ltd.
How North American Construction Group Ltd. stacks up
NOA · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #115 of 387 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including NOA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -3.5% vs peer median 6.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.0% vs peer median 5.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 83% of peers. EBITDA yield: 22.3% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NOA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NOA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 6.7% | 5.8% | 59% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 22.3% | 12.4% | 83% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 2.1% | 6.0% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 101.0% | 60.0% | 80% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NOA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 112 | 33.9B USD | 71 | 71 | |
| 112 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score