Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HMH Holding Inc.
How HMH Holding Inc. stacks up
HMH · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
77/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #88 of 387 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including HMH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 82% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.9% vs peer median 5.2%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 98% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 51.2% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HMH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HMH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 0.9% | 5.8% | 18% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | Not reported | 12.4% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 51.2% | 6.0% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | Not reported | 60.0% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HMH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 84 | 2.2B USD | 78 | 89 | |
| 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score