Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RMBS · against 501 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #39 of 502 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)55 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including RMBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RMBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 465 reported | 0.01× | 0.30× | 92% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 461 reported | 1.87 | 1.25 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 505 reported | 9.75× | 1.86× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 2 | 129M USD | 100 | 48 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 35 | 66M USD | 93 | 51 | |
| 36 | 1.3B USD | 93 | 73 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 37 |
| 421.5B USD |
| 93 |
| 78 |
| 38 | 751M USD | 93 | 46 |
| 39 | 9.6B USD | 93 | 75 |
| 40 | 6.5B USD | 92 | 38 |
| 41 | 823M USD | 92 | 43 |
| 42 | 376M USD | 92 | 48 |
| 42 | 852M USD | 92 | 38 |