Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CEVA · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #136 of 1,698 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CEVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CEVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.05× | 0.26× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.93 | 0.84 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 10.12× | 1.83× | 97% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 132 | 170M AUD (≈$112M) | 92 | 32 | |
| 133 | 1.55T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 92 | 68 | |
| 134 | 4.9B CNY (≈$685M) | 92 | 27 | |
| 135 | 2.6B HKD (≈$334M) | 92 | 43 | |
| 136 | 823M USD | 92 | 43 | |
| 137 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 92 | 80 | |
| 138 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 92 | 61 | |
| 139 | 111.4B JPY (≈$757M) | 92 | 64 | |
| 140 | 70M HKD (≈$9M) | 92 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score