Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAVN · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #130 of 1,698 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including NAVN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NAVN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.13× | 0.26× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | Not reported | 0.84 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 4.38× | 1.83× | 87% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 126 | 90.1B INR (≈$1.1B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 127 | 27M MYR (≈$6M) | 93 | 59 | |
| 128 | 1.02T KRW (≈$733M) | 93 | 85 | |
| 129 | 4.0B TWD (≈$123M) | 92 | 65 | |
| 130 | 6.5B USD | 92 | 38 | |
| 131 | 15.2B TWD (≈$472M) | 92 | 24 | |
| 132 | 170M AUD (≈$112M) | 92 | 32 | |
| 133 | 1.55T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 92 | 68 | |
| 134 | 4.9B CNY (≈$685M) | 92 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score