Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SHAZ · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #144 of 1,698 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including SHAZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SHAZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.90× | 0.26× | 18% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 6.07 | 0.84 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 10.55× | 1.83× | 97% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 141 | 4.7B HKD (≈$601M) | 92 | 45 | |
| 142 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.4B CNY (≈$619M) |
| 92 |
| 56 |
| 143 | 2.5B CNY (≈$344M) | 92 | 65 |
| 144 | 376M USD | 92 | 48 |
| 144 | 852M USD | 92 | 38 |
| 146 | 2.2B USD | 91 | 27 |
| 147 | 730M USD | 91 | 50 |
| 148 | 8.3B USD | 91 | 71 |
| 149 | 3.9B USD | 91 | 36 |