Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RELX PLC
How RELX PLC stacks up
RELX · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,309 of 2,400 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including RELX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 8.9% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RELX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RELX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 1.7% | 4.4% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 8.9% | 7.1% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 3.9% | 4.2% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RELX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,309 | 1.6B BRL (≈$283M) | 45 | 53 | |
| 1,309 | 6.7B USD | 45 | 53 | |
| 1,309 | 2.8B GBP (≈$3.6B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 1,309 | 384M USD | 45 | 48 | |
| 1,309 | 68.5B USD | 45 | 50 | |
| 1,309 | 92.8B INR (≈$1.1B) | 45 | 68 | |
| 1,309 | 4.9B CAD (≈$3.6B) | 45 | 53 | |
| 1,309 | 10.2B USD | 45 | 55 | |
| 1,333 | 1.57T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 44 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score