Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bloom Energy Corporation
How Bloom Energy Corporation stacks up
BE · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 2,400 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score252 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including BE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 32.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 98% of peers. Revenue growth: 91.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 700.3% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 91.0% | 4.4% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 700.3% | 7.1% | 99% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 32.7% | 4.2% | 96% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 6.6B NOK (≈$625M) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 518M EUR (≈$570M) | 100 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score