Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RELX PLC
How RELX PLC stacks up
RELX · against 82 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #57 of 83 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score10 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including RELX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 8.9% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RELX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RELX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 83 reported | 1.7% | 7.4% | 20% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 8.9% | 7.8% | 53% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 82 reported | 3.9% | 6.8% | 32% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RELX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 3 | 34.8B USD | 95 | 49 | |
| 52 | 75.3B USD | 48 | 39 | |
| 54 | 46.8B USD | 47 | 52 | |
| 54 | 74.4B USD | 47 | 47 | |
| 56 | 436.1B SEK (≈$43.6B) | 46 | 50 | |
| 57 | 68.5B USD | 45 | 50 | |
| 58 | 5.51T JPY (≈$37.5B) | 44 | 58 | |
| 59 | 453.2B SEK (≈$45.3B) | 43 | 50 | |
| 60 | 15.68T JPY (≈$106.6B) | 39 | 41 | |
| 60 | 75.7B USD | 39 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score