Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RC-PC · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #119 of 751 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including RC-PC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RC-PC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 3.51× | 0.82× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.53 | 0.69 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 6.46× | 1.20× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 115 | 122.7B INR (≈$1.5B) | 85 | 55 | |
| 116 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 51.5B JPY (≈$350M) |
| 85 |
| 78 |
| 117 | 6.4B CNY (≈$894M) | 85 | 58 |
| 118 | 38.0B JPY (≈$258M) | 84 | 83 |
| 119 | Unavailable | 84 |
| 120 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 84 | 82 |
| 121 | 3.2B CNY (≈$444M) | 84 | 48 |
| 122 | 1.75T INR (≈$21.1B) | 84 | 41 |
| 123 | 30.2B THB (≈$846M) | 84 | 54 |