Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Restaurant Brands International Inc.
How Restaurant Brands International Inc. stacks up
QSR · against 78 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #38 of 79 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including QSR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 32.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 78% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 12.7% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QSR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QSR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 79 reported | 6.5% | 9.7% | 37% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 71 reported | 32.8% | 11.2% | 64% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 79 reported | 12.7% | 9.8% | 62% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QSR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 38.3B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 35 | 1.46T INR (≈$17.6B) | 76 | 54 | |
| 35 | 17.2B GBP (≈$22.4B) | 76 | 60 | |
| 35 | 23.5B USD | 76 | 62 | |
| 38 | 28.4B EUR (≈$31.3B) | 74 | 59 | |
| 38 | 34.0B USD | 74 | 52 | |
| 40 | 216.5B HKD (≈$27.7B) | 70 | 76 | |
| 41 | 18.0B USD | 69 | 56 | |
| 42 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 68 | 74 | |
| 42 | 52.8B USD | 68 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score