Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PATK · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #661 of 1,553 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including PATK · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | PATK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 5.2% | 4.4% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 10.3% | 8.8% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 4.7% | 6.1% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 43.3% | 57.2% | 39% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 661 | 13.1B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 57 | 42 | |
| 661 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 327M USD |
| 57 |
| 51 |
| 661 | 604M USD | 57 | 33 |
| 661 | 4.4B USD | 57 | 53 |
| 661 | 2.6B USD | 57 | 49 |
| 661 | 4.2B USD | 57 | 31 |
| 661 | 1.25T BRL (≈$225.8B) | 57 | 50 |
| 661 | 2.0B USD | 57 | 27 |
| 661 | 1.8B USD | 57 | 46 |