Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Holley Inc.
How Holley Inc. stacks up
HLLY · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #661 of 1,553 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HLLY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.2% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HLLY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HLLY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 3.0% | 4.4% | 38% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 13.6% | 8.8% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 10.1% | 6.1% | 70% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 139.9% | 57.2% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HLLY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 661 | 47.9B JPY (≈$326M) | 57 | 47 | |
| 661 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score