Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NOW · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,009 of 1,667 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including NOW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
| Metric | NOW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 1.5% | 2.3% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 2.5% | 4.3% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 4.1% | 2.7% | 59% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 11.1% | 33.4% | 14% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,009 | 9.8B USD | 39 | 58 | |
| 1,009 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 203M EUR (≈$223M) |
| 39 |
| 42 |
| 1,009 | 10.6B USD | 39 | 50 |
| 1,009 | 3.7B USD | 39 | 71 |
| 1,009 | 112.9B USD | 39 | 49 |
| 1,009 | 952.5B INR (≈$11.4B) | 39 | 72 |
| 1,026 | 5.2B CNY (≈$722M) | 38 | 34 |
| 1,026 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 38 | 33 |
| 1,026 | 35.9B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 38 | 60 |