Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Life360, Inc.
How Life360, Inc. stacks up
LIF · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,009 of 1,667 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LIF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LIF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LIF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 3.8% | 2.3% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 0.7% | 4.3% | 23% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 2.7% | 2.7% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 16.8% | 33.4% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LIF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,009 | 5.4B TWD (≈$168M) | 39 | 26 | |
| 1,009 | 9.8B USD | 39 | 58 | |
| 1,009 | 203M EUR (≈$223M) | 39 | 42 | |
| 1,009 | 10.6B USD | 39 | 50 | |
| 1,009 | 3.7B USD | 39 | 71 | |
| 1,009 | 112.9B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 1,009 | 952.5B INR (≈$11.4B) | 39 | 72 | |
| 1,026 | 5.2B CNY (≈$722M) | 38 | 34 | |
| 1,026 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 38 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score