Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NOW · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,320 of 1,698 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including NOW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NOW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.68× | 0.26× | 25% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.99 | 0.84 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.70× | 1.83× | 4% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,316 | 12.3B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 23 | 24 | |
| 1,317 | 5.2B HKD (≈$661M) | 22 | 60 | |
| 1,318 | 2.7B AUD (≈$1.8B) | 22 | 49 | |
| 1,319 | 18.7B NOK (≈$1.8B) | 22 | 52 | |
| 1,320 | 112.9B USD | 22 | 49 | |
| 1,321 | 321.1B KRW (≈$231M) | 22 | 51 | |
| 1,322 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 22 | 31 | |
| 1,323 | 27.3B TWD (≈$845M) | 22 | 19 | |
| 1,324 | 174.5B TWD (≈$5.4B) | 22 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score