Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
How Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. stacks up
NOG · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #162 of 387 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including NOG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -18.3% vs peer median 5.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -11.1% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 84% of peers. EBITDA yield: 22.5% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NOG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NOG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | -19.4% | 5.8% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 22.5% | 12.4% | 84% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | -11.1% | 6.0% | 9% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 75.3% | 60.0% | 63% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NOG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 158 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 32 | |
| 158 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score