Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PDS · against 386 other Energy companies
Ranked #158 of 387 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including PDS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Energy peers.
| Metric | PDS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | Not reported | 5.8% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 19.1% | 12.4% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 6.9% | 6.0% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 91.6% | 60.0% | 73% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 154 | 30.5B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 154 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 13.0B USD |
| 60 |
| 50 |
| 154 | 1.5B USD | 60 | 51 |
| 158 | 120.0B USD | 59 | 62 |
| 158 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 32 |
| 158 | 4.4B AUD (≈$2.9B) | 59 | 39 |
| 158 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 49 |
| 162 | 34.0B USD | 58 | 37 |
| 162 | 2.7B USD | 58 | 21 |