Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
How Dorchester Minerals, L.P. stacks up
DMLP · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #166 of 387 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including DMLP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 12.1% vs peer median 12.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.3% vs peer median 5.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.3% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DMLP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DMLP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 6.2% | 5.8% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 12.1% | 12.4% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 11.3% | 6.0% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 22.7% | 60.0% | 11% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DMLP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 162 | 2.7B USD | 58 | 21 | |
| 162 | 697M USD | 58 | 50 | |
| 162 | 54.3B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 58 | 52 | |
| 166 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 57 | 66 | |
| 166 | 1.4B USD | 57 | 80 | |
| 166 | 9.34T IDR (≈$579M) | 57 | 41 | |
| 169 | 140.4B JPY (≈$955M) | 56 | 54 | |
| 169 | 69.4B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 169 | 20.1B USD | 56 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score