Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
How Dorchester Minerals, L.P. stacks up
DMLP · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #115 of 386 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including DMLP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.5% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.7% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 77% of peers. Revenue growth: 13.9% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DMLP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DMLP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 13.9% | 0.5% | 77% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | 4.5% | 1.0% | 54% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 7.7% | -1.3% | 76% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DMLP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 111 | 2.2B USD | 71 | 60 | |
| 111 | 2.1B USD | 71 | 76 | |
| 111 | 318M USD | 71 | 44 | |
| 111 | 755M USD | 71 | 41 | |
| 115 | 1.4B USD | 70 | 80 | |
| 115 | 6.7B USD | 70 | 56 | |
| 115 | 1.4B CAD (≈$986M) | 70 | 67 | |
| 118 | 15.1B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 69 | 63 | |
| 118 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 69 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score