Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Northrop Grumman Corporation
How Northrop Grumman Corporation stacks up
NOC · against 73 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #41 of 74 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score10 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including NOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 14.9% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NOC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 74 reported | 5.9% | 7.4% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 69 reported | 14.9% | 8.6% | 68% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 73 reported | 4.2% | 6.6% | 35% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NOC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 5 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 36 | 73.1B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 36 | 93.8B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 39 | 22.15T JPY (≈$150.6B) | 55 | 60 | |
| 40 | 3.32T INR (≈$39.8B) | 54 | 53 | |
| 41 | 78.2B USD | 53 | 52 | |
| 42 | 54.8B USD | 51 | 49 | |
| 42 | 65.8B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 42 | 119.2B USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 45 | 92.8B USD | 50 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score