Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Parker-Hannifin Corporation
How Parker-Hannifin Corporation stacks up
PH · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,165 of 2,400 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including PH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.8% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 64% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.3% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 8.3% | 4.4% | 64% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 3.8% | 7.1% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 4.1% | 4.2% | 49% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,165 | 65.8B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 1,165 | 17.5B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 1,165 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 51 | 55 | |
| 1,165 | 5.9B EUR (≈$6.5B) | 51 | 62 | |
| 1,165 | 119.2B USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 1,165 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 51 | 45 | |
| 1,165 | 5.1B USD | 51 | 52 | |
| 1,165 | 17.0B CHF (≈$19.6B) | 51 | 48 | |
| 1,165 | 25.6B USD | 51 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score