Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to United Rentals, Inc.
How United Rentals, Inc. stacks up
URI · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #973 of 2,400 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including URI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = URI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | URI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 6.9% | 4.4% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 7.5% | 7.1% | 51% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 8.5% | 4.2% | 68% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around URI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 973 | 2.7B GBP (≈$3.5B) | 59 | 50 | |
| 973 | 402M EUR (≈$442M) | 59 | 80 | |
| 973 | 47M AUD (≈$31M) | 59 | 40 | |
| 973 | 355.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 59 | 46 | |
| 973 | 73.1B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 973 | 51.7B INR (≈$620M) | 59 | 66 | |
| 973 | 17.1B USD | 59 | 42 | |
| 973 | 93.8B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 997 | 5.9B CNY (≈$820M) | 58 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score