Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nordic American Tankers Limited
How Nordic American Tankers Limited stacks up
NAT · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
16/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #324 of 387 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including NAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.8% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 7.8% | 5.8% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 8.8% | 12.4% | 29% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 7.6% | 6.0% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 30.3% | 60.0% | 16% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 320 | 30.1B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 17 | 23 | |
| 320 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score