Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAT · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #163 of 399 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including NAT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.85× | 0.49× | 31% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | -0.52 | 0.48 | 98% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 3.27× | 1.37× | 89% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 159 | 9.1B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 60 | 27 | |
| 160 | 6.8B USD | 60 | 70 | |
| 161 | 548.8B JPY (≈$3.7B) | 60 | 79 | |
| 162 | 2.1B USD | 60 | 58 | |
| 163 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 30 | |
| 164 | 934.4B HKD (≈$119.6B) | 59 | 58 | |
| 165 | 6.0B AUD (≈$4.0B) | 59 | 57 | |
| 166 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 73 | |
| 167 | 87.1B CNY (≈$12.2B) | 58 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score