Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to WhiteHawk Minerals Corp.
How WhiteHawk Minerals Corp. stacks up
WHK · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #320 of 387 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including WHK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.0% vs peer median 5.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.9% vs peer median 12.1%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WHK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WHK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | -11.8% | 5.8% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 8.3% | 12.4% | 27% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | Not reported | 6.0% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 56.1% | 60.0% | 47% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WHK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 316 | 881M USD | 18 | 31 | |
| 320 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score