Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAT · against 195 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #71 of 196 · scores higher than 64% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)20 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including NAT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 190 reported | 0.85× | 0.58× | 34% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 186 reported | -0.52 | 0.58 | 98% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 197 reported | 3.27× | 1.44× | 86% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 5 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 67 | 697M USD | 61 | 50 | |
| 68 | 4.3B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 69 | 6.8B USD | 60 | 70 | |
| 70 | 2.1B USD | 60 | 58 | |
| 71 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 30 | |
| 72 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 73 | |
| 73 | Unavailable | 57 | ||
| 74 | 66.8B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 75 | 12.6B USD | 56 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score