Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GLOP-PA · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #174 of 399 · scores higher than 57% of peers · safety percentile 57
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including GLOP-PA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GLOP-PA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.04× | 0.49× | 93% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | Not reported | 0.48 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 0.71× | 1.37× | 13% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 170 | 15.1B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 58 | 63 | |
| 171 | 93.4B NOK (≈$8.9B) | 57 | 64 | |
| 172 | 35.9B HKD (≈$4.6B) | 57 | 69 | |
| 173 | 320M EUR (≈$352M) | 57 | 69 | |
| 174 | Unavailable | 57 | ||
| 175 | 66.8B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 176 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 56 | 59 | |
| 177 | 12.6B USD | 56 | 68 | |
| 178 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 56 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score