Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMO · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #175 of 399 · scores higher than 56% of peers · safety percentile 56
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including IMO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.17× | 0.49× | 80% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.81 | 0.48 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 1.38× | 1.37× | 51% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 171 | 93.4B NOK (≈$8.9B) | 57 | 64 | |
| 172 | 35.9B HKD (≈$4.6B) | 57 | 69 | |
| 173 | 320M EUR (≈$352M) | 57 | 69 | |
| 174 | Unavailable | 57 | ||
| 175 | 66.8B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 176 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 56 | 59 | |
| 177 | 12.6B USD | 56 | 68 | |
| 178 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 56 | 31 | |
| 179 | 58.0B THB (≈$1.6B) | 55 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score