Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Imperial Oil Limited
How Imperial Oil Limited stacks up
IMO · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #204 of 386 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including IMO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -6.8% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -1.1% vs peer median -1.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IMO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IMO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 4.5% | 0.5% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -6.8% | 1.0% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | -1.1% | -1.3% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IMO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 200 | 1.5B USD | 48 | 50 | |
| 200 | 64.3B USD | 48 | 43 | |
| 204 | 674M USD | 47 | 45 | |
| 204 | 1.6B USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 204 | 66.8B USD | 47 | 49 | |
| 207 | 93M MYR (≈$21M) | 46 | 61 | |
| 207 | 42.6B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 46 | 63 | |
| 207 | 697M USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 207 | 1.9B USD | 46 | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score