Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to N-able, Inc.
How N-able, Inc. stacks up
NABL · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #626 of 1,667 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including NABL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.7% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NABL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NABL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -0.6% | 2.3% | 23% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 5.2% | 4.3% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 6.3% | 2.7% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 84.5% | 33.4% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NABL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 626 | 3.2B USD | 62 | 67 | |
| 626 | 18.8B USD | 62 | 64 | |
| 626 | 1.3B AUD (≈$854M) | 62 | 55 | |
| 626 | 376M USD | 62 | 48 | |
| 626 | 952M USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 626 | 382.5B USD | 62 | 55 | |
| 626 | 11.9B USD | 62 | 55 | |
| 626 | 216M EUR (≈$238M) | 62 | 16 | |
| 626 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 62 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score