Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NABL · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #941 of 1,698 · scores higher than 45% of peers · safety percentile 45
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including NABL · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio and debt / equity than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NABL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.54× | 0.26× | 31% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.46 | 0.84 | 77% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.30× | 1.83× | 27% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 937 | 1.1B AUD (≈$709M) | 45 | 46 | |
| 938 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 24.1B USD |
| 45 |
| 48 |
| 939 | 2.0B USD | 45 | 58 |
| 940 | 3.0B EUR (≈$3.3B) | 45 | 52 |
| 941 | 952M USD | 45 | 46 |
| 942 | 2.3B USD | 45 | 60 |
| 943 | 2.4B USD | 44 | 56 |
| 944 | 4.2B CNY (≈$586M) | 44 | 51 |
| 945 | 937M USD | 44 | 74 |