Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DAKT · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #945 of 1,698 · scores higher than 44% of peers · safety percentile 44
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including DAKT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DAKT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.05× | 0.26× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.68 | 0.84 | 12% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 2.17× | 1.83× | 60% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 941 | 952M USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 942 | 2.3B USD | 45 | 60 | |
| 943 | 2.4B USD | 44 | 56 | |
| 944 | 4.2B CNY (≈$586M) | 44 | 51 | |
| 945 | 937M USD | 44 | 74 | |
| 946 | 5.4B ILS (≈$1.5B) | 44 | 63 | |
| 947 | 14.8B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 44 | 30 | |
| 948 | 665M NZD (≈$399M) | 44 | 37 | |
| 949 | 8.73T JPY (≈$59.4B) | 44 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score